Assemblies of God – Abusing Local Ministers and Confiscating Church Property

Short Summary: In a warning to Michigan Assemblies of God (AG) member churches, this article documents the actions of the Assemblies of God Michigan District over the past 5 years to:

1. Steal a local congregation’s church property.
2. Gain court-sanctioned unlimited control over every Assemblies of God church in Michigan.
3. Retaliate against pastors who out of conscience decide to leave the Assemblies of God.

This article documents the actions of Assemblies of God Michigan leadership, and the backing of those actions by Assemblies of God national leadership. Innocent ministers are being abused. All appeals regarding district abuse are ignored by AG national leadership. The AG has misutilized contributions from member churches and minister’s tithes by using these funds to file lawsuits to steal property from local congregations, creating case precedent for the same actions against other churches. The AG is claiming they  are a hierarchical organization (denomination) in courts of law. The AG is arbitrarily dismissing as ‘unethical’ any innocent minister who decides to disaffiliate from the Assemblies of God. The last 2 pages of the article focus on the danger of the 53rd General Council proposed resolutions 12, 13, and 14.

This article is not intended to be read online.

The text in this post is only for the benefit of search engines.

 Download the article from this link.

In pursuing the objectives above, the Assemblies of God Michigan District has:

• Made false statements to Pastors and congregations to disguise their aggressive actions.
• Misled a congregation by withholding information that would exonerate their Pastor of slanderous allegations.
• Prolonged investigation of these untrue allegations, allowing the slander full time to do its damage.
• Given priority to taking over the church’s assets instead of focusing on mediation, healing, and timely investigation of allegations.
• Illegally declared that the church’s property could be seized at their sole and unrestricted discretion.
• Ignored the procedure prescribed in the church’s Constitution for any AG attempt to remove leaders from ministry.
• Attempted to arbitrarily dismiss the church’s Elders.
• Ignored the Biblical mandate laid down by Christ’s apostle Paul to not sue one another before unbelievers.
• Initiated a lawsuit to steal the congregation’s property after it voted unanimously to disassociate from the Assemblies of God.
• Prolonged their legal attack by filing an appeal after the court ruled in the congregation’s favor.
• Distorted the truth in their legal briefs in order to win the case.
• Claimed in Michigan courts of law that they are a hierarchical organization (a full denomination with complete control of member congregations) rather than a congregational organization (a fellowship of self-governed member congregations).

These facts will be evident from the details below. The men of the Assemblies of God Michigan District and General Council Presbytery have broken the trust placed in them by their member churches. They have had 5 years to reconsider and repent of their actions in the case described below. Yet to this very day, they persist in their actions. To scan the details quickly, read the underlined material. Pay careful attention to dates, because the character of these men is exposed by what they knew, and when they knew it. These men are supposed to be mature, competent church leaders, having proven themselves in local assemblies before being called upon to serve the body of Christ regionally and nationally.

This article contains a witness regarding the actions of the Assemblies of God Michigan District Presbytery. The Apostle Paul stated, “Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses” (1 Tim 5:19).  So that you can confirm these things, a second witness regarding the actions of the Michigan District and General Council comes from a former Michigan District Presbyter himself, Pastor Jeff Whittaker of Michiana Christian Embassy of Niles, MI. His witness is found on Michiana Christian Embassy’s website.

THE PLAYERS:

• Gospel Lighthouse – A small church incorporated in 1984, located near 8 Mile Rd. in southeast Warren, MI.
• Rev. Bobby Johnson – Pastor of Gospel Lighthouse in Warren, MI since its original incorporation in 1984.
  • Bible Degree from Central Bible College (Who’s Who Among College Students).
  • 40 hrs of Master’s-level work with 4.0 GPA at Wayne State and Ashland Theological Seminary.
  • Sacrificed an offer to pastor a large suburban church, instead following God’s call to pastor a small church in the needy area near 8 Mile Rd in Warren, MI for over 25 years.
• Rev. Jeff Whittaker – Pastor of Michiana Christian Embassy of Niles, MI. Former Michigan District Sectional Presbyter (’00-’05).
• Assemblies of God Executive Presbytery – The Assemblies of God board of directors
  • Dr. George O. Wood – General Superintendent (CEO) of the Assemblies of God. Previously General Secretary (’93-’07).
  • John M. Palmer – Former General Secretary of the Assemblies of God (‘07-‘08).
• Assemblies of God Michigan District – The Michigan state-level Assemblies of God leadership. 
  • Rev. William Leach – District Superintendent (AG Michigan District ‘president’)
  • Rev. Jeff Hlavin – District Secretary-Treasurer
  • Rev. Norman Muhling – Former District Missions Director
  • Rev. Otis Buchan – District Director of Camp Ministries and District Supervised Churches

TIMELINE OF EVENTS:

Jan 20, 1984 – Incorporation : 25 years ago, a newly-formed Gospel Lighthouse church files Articles of Incorporation with the state of Michigan under the name “Gospel Lighthouse” (Michigan ID 725124). This new corporation is not to be confused with a separate corporation named “Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God” (Michigan ID 799022). Since it is a brand new entity, Gospel Lighthouse’s 1984 Articles of Incorporation are not filed as either ‘restated’ or ‘amended’ Articles of Incorporation, but instead as new Articles of Incorporation. The Articles include a provision establishing terms of the new church’s relationship with the Assemblies of God: “We Gospel Lighthouse declare that we are in cooperative fellowship with the Michigan District Council of the Assemblies of God according to the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse.” The church’s Constitution and Bylaws echo: “we…do hereby recognize ourselves as…a part of The General Council of the Assemblies of God, and of the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…” In the climate of the Assemblies of God of the early 1980’s, each church had to have their own Constitution and Bylaws. The Michigan District had distributed suggested language, but it was not mandatory, and churches could pick and choose language to fit their own situation. 

There are two important facts to note here:

1. Per its Articles of Incorporation, Gospel Lighthouse’s relationship with the Assemblies of God is based solely on the terms described in the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse. The conditions and limitations stated in the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws limit the powers granted to the AG and define the role it may play in the new church.
2. The Constitution and Bylaws of the Assemblies of God Michigan District are not the defining documents in the relationship between Gospel Lighthouse and the Assemblies of God.

Food for thought: In the details below, watch for how the Assemblies of God Michigan District tries to link the “Gospel Lighthouse” corporation formed in 1984 with the corporation “Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God”. Why does the Assemblies of God do this? Also watch for how the Michigan District Presbyters violate the terms and conditions of the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse.

1986 – Request for Opinion: Gospel Lighthouse sends a letter to the Assemblies of God Michigan District requesting their opinion on Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws. The letter’s intent is to make sure that the church’s documentation is acceptable to the Michigan District as a basis for cooperative fellowship with Gospel Lighthouse.

Dec 31, 1986 – The Confirmation: The Assemblies of God Michigan District (Rev. Ernest Zilch) accepts Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws as a basis for cooperative fellowship between itself and Gospel Lighthouse.

May, 1988 – District Notified of Misclassification: The Assemblies of God Michigan District has labeled Gospel Lighthouse a “District Supervised Church”. Per Assemblies of God Michigan District Bylaws, the classifications “District Supervised Church” and “District Advanced Church” both apply to churches that are not allowed to hold title to property, and are to be “held under the general supervision of the Presbyter Board”, having “not matured sufficiently to assume their full share of responsibility for the maintenance of scriptural order.” Additionally, for both District Supervised and District Advanced churches, “the Presbyter Board shall provide appropriate Rules of Order for their operation according to their degree of development.” Since its inception 4 years prior, Gospel Lighthouse has not only held title to its own property, but the Michigan District Presbyter Board has never once met with the church or provided rules of order for the church’s operation. Therefore the church is not a District Supervised Church or a District Advanced Church. The only possible classification for a church that either holds title to its property in its corporate name or that is self-governing is “Autonomous Church”. Gospel Lighthouse both holds its own property and is self-governing, and therefore it is Autonomous. Since Gospel Lighthouse has been misclassified, it petitions the Michigan District for Autonomous Church classification, in accordance with its actual status by virtue of its self-governance and property ownership. The Assemblies of God Michigan District denies the request, instead upgrading the status of Gospel Lighthouse to District Advanced Church.

Feb 24, 1992 – Classification Status Revisited: Still aware of the disconnect between the church’s actual operation and the Michigan District’s classification, Gospel Lighthouse again petitions the Michigan District to correct the church’s status to Autonomous Church. Since the Michigan District Presbyter Board has not provided any church oversight or rules of order in the 8 years since the church’s incorporation, and since the church holds property in its corporate name, Gospel Lighthouse is clearly an Autonomous Church in operation.

Oct 19, 1992 – Michigan District Corrects the Classification: The Assemblies of God Michigan District corrects the misclassification of Gospel Lighthouse, recognizing it as an Autonomous Church.

Sept 5, 2004 (Sun) – The Allegations: The church treasurer of Gospel Lighthouse (who is also a church Elder) resigns his position after receiving a letter that was sent to Gospel Lighthouse Elders containing 3 allegations against Gospel Lighthouse Pastor Bobby Johnson, one of which is “misappropriation of church funds”. Prior to resigning, the elder does not make inquiry to determine if the allegations are true. He initially refuses to hand over the books unless Bill Leach tells him to, and requests to know who the new treasurer will be. But later he hands over the books. Later that week, a second Gospel Lighthouse elder forwards the letter of allegations to the Assemblies of God Michigan District. He also distributes the letter to several members of the congregation, asking them to write or call the District office. The elder does not discuss with the Pastor or other Elders his decision to get the District involved, but instead makes an independent decision to go over their heads (much as Judas Iscariot bypassed both his peers and his leader in approaching the religious leaders of his day).

Sept 11, 2004 (Sat) – The Michigan District Inserts Itself: Assemblies of God Michigan District William (Bill) Leach meets in his office with Pastor Johnson regarding the allegations. Leach states that Pastor Johnson’s accuser is obtaining information regarding the financial allegations from the former treasurer, a claim the former treasurer later denies. Leach states his intent to speak with the former treasurer the following week. Pastor Johnson denies all allegations, proclaiming his innocence.  Leach tells Pastor Johnson that “if everything you’re telling me is true, you’ll have no problem with us.” Bill Leach states that he intends to meet together with Pastor Johnson and the person making the allegations the following week. This will give Pastor Johnson the ability to defend himself before his accuser. Bill Leach informs Pastor Johnson that he is going to reclassify Gospel Lighthouse as a District Supervised Church. Unbeknownst to Pastor Johnson, this action would violate the protocol and procedure laid out in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution (details in Sept 13, 2004 entry below), and is therefore illegal (see Jan 20, 1984 entry above). The significance of being classified a District Supervised Church according to the Michigan District’s 2004 Constitution and Bylaws is that it gives the Michigan District power to arbitrarily seize and take possession of the church’s property and assets (see Oct 3, 2004 entry below). But the Pastor, Elders, and congregation of Gospel Lighthouse are completely unaware of this aspect of District Supervised status for almost a month, until the Michigan District Presbytery on Oct 3 distributes a 14-page document titled “Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches”, which contain property rights clauses buried in page 13. In the meantime, Pastor Johnson freely cooperates with Bill Leach’s requests because he believes in authority, and believes that the integrity of the Assemblies of God at the District Level will lead the way.

Food for thought: Note that William Leach decides to reclassify Gospel Lighthouse prior to interviewing the person who made the allegations (see Sept 16, 2004 entry below). So even ignoring the issue of its legality, Leach’s decision is clearly premature; he is positioning himself to gain control of Gospel Lighthouse’s property before he understands the situation. If you were in the District Superintendent’s position and learned of the allegations against Pastor Johnson, would you give first priority to gaining absolute control of the church? Or would you determine the truth as quickly as possible, in case the allegations were false? Would you take a long time with an investigation and let the unproven allegations damage Pastor Johnson’s reputation, or would you quickly within 1 week interview not only the person making the allegations and the treasurer who resigned, but also the church’s leadership (the remaining Elders)? Pay attention below as the Michigan District Presbyters not only drag out the investigation over 7 weeks, but in the process of that investigation never once speak to the church’s remaining Elders, except to dismiss them as leaders of Gospel Lighthouse.

Sept 13, 2004 (Mon) – The Michigan District’s Illegal Reclassification: According to a court brief submitted March 31, 2006 by the Assemblies of God Michigan District, on this date District Superintendent William Leach performs a fax poll vote of the District Executive Board to reclassify Gospel Lighthouse as a District Supervised Church. Since the relationship between the Assemblies of God and Gospel Lighthouse is governed by the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse (see Jan 20 1984 entry above), and not the Constitution and Bylaws of the Assemblies of God Michigan District, William Leach is out of line in his actions. Let’s examine the Constitution of Gospel Lighthouse (adopted Jan 20, 1984), in order to demonstrate the illegal nature of the Michigan District’s actions. We will examine the articles dealing with property transfer or removal of leadership:

“Gospel Lighthouse, a church affiliated with the Assemblies of God, shall have the right to govern itself…” – Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

So we see the right of governance is reserved to the church, not the Michigan District.

“As a member of the General Council this assembly agrees to…recognize that the District Council or the General Council of the Assemblies of God shall have the right and authority to disapprove doctrine and conduct contrary to the Statement of Fundamental Truths…The above said disapproval of doctrine and conduct shall be submitted in writing to the Pastor and Elders of this assembly who shall convey such disapproval to the assembly…if after thirty days from receipt of written notification, no reconciliation can be reached, the Michigan District shall have the right to remove any and all from governing rule of said assembly and from being a part of “the committed body”, who are involved in the support or propagation of such actions.” – Article III, Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

Gospel Lighthouse placed this language in its Constitution to ensure that church members would have recourse in case the Pastor or Elders were to go against sound doctrine. We see that prior to making any move regarding the church’s doctrine or conduct, the Michigan District is required to submit this in writing, and then wait 30 days before taking action. The Michigan District never at any point in this process submitted written disapproval of doctrine or conduct to the church Elders, church body, or Pastor. Yet the Michigan District Superintendent almost immediately took action to reclassify the church as a District Supervised church.

“In the event defection shall occur from the tenets of faith as stated within the Statement of Fundamental Truths…, resulting in a breech with the Assemblies of God, Michigan District, and the same procedure has been followed as stated within Article III, 6…[the procedure described above of submitting disapproval of doctrine and conduct in writing, and engaging in a 30-day reconciliation period], any portion of the membership subscribing to and practicing the aforesaid tenets of faith and the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse and retaining membership with Gospel Lighthouse, shall retain possession of, and title to, all properties of said church with full rights thereto as provided in its Constitution and Bylaws.” – Article XII – Property, Section 2., Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

Note that ALL conditions must be met before the result is enacted. It is not a sufficient condition for (1) a breech to occur with the Assemblies of God, but additionally there must be (2) a defection from the tenets of faith defined in the Statement of Fundamental Truths, (3) a letter written disapproving doctrine or conduct, and (4) a 30 day reconciliatory period. Only one of the four necessary conditions was ever met (a breech with the Assemblies of God, Michigan District).

“In the event this church shall cease to function for the purposes as declared heretofore in the Articles of its Constitution, then, after providing for the payment of its debts, the remaining assets will…be transferred to, the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God.” – Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

So the condition that would cause the property to revert to the Assemblies of God is a cessation of church function. Gospel Lighthouse has never ceased to function, therefore this condition has never been met.

“In the event of cessation of this church, The Elected Deacons along with the Pastor, shall within one year thereafter transfer all properties and any remaining assets to the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God in accordance with the foregoing provisions.” – Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

Note again that the condition for property transfer, the “cessation of this church”, was never met. Also note that in such a situation, the decision to transfer the property is to be initiated by and incumbent on the Elected Deacons and the Pastor. It is not the Assemblies of God’s prerogative to initiate/demand/sue for the property.

Sept 16, 2004 (Thu) – Checking the Allegations: Bill Leach, along with his wife and Jeff Hlavin, meets in his office with the person who made allegations against Pastor Johnson. Pastor Johnson is not invited, because the person who made the allegations refuses to meet with Pastor Johnson in attendance. This gives Pastor Johnson no opportunity to defend himself.

Food for thought: Leach’s decision to meet with Pastor Johnson’s accuser without Pastor Johnson present to defend himself puts Pastor Johnson at a disadvantage. At the following Presbyter Board meeting, it is clear to Pastor Johnson that Leach and Hlavin believe the allegations against him, and are attempting to portray Pastor Johnson as guilty before the District Presbyters.

Sept 17, 2004 (Fri) – Pastor Johnson Before the Presbyter Board: Pastor Johnson appears before the Presbyter Board of the Assemblies of God Michigan District. For a large portion of this meeting, Pastor Johnson is asked to step out of the room. When he returns, Pastor Johnson is asked if he’d be willing to step down from active preaching and teaching until the allegations could be researched and investigated. It is explained that he is not being removed from ministry; Pastor Johnson is told it’s similar to a police officer taking a leave of absence while his actions are investigated. Pastor Johnson complies with this request, and agrees to step down from active preaching and teaching as an act of faith and good will toward the Michigan District Presbytery. Bill Leach asks Pastor Johnson to hand over church/personal computers for scanning. Pastor Johnson agrees to hand over the computers. The Board is divided, and several Michigan District Presbyters say, “Pastor Johnson, you don’t want to do that.” William Leach interjects, “He said we could have them!” Pastor Johnson states that he has nothing to hide. The District Presbyters have in their possession copies of Gospel Lighthouse’s financial statement, provided by the Gospel Lighthouse’s new treasurer. While reviewing these financial statements, several of the District Presbyters state, “It’s all here.” The Michigan District should now have the information it needs to clear Pastor Johnson of the 1^st of 3 allegations, the supposed “misappropriation of church funds”.

Food for thought: Note Pastor Johnson’s compliance with the District’s requests. Later on, you will see how Pastor Johnson is unfairly portrayed as unwilling to submit.

Sept 18, 2004 (Sat) – Computers Scanned: Church/personal computers are handed over to the Assemblies of God Michigan District for scanning.

Sept 19, 2004 (Sun) – Stand-in Ministers: The AG Michigan District provides a stand-in minister for the Gospel Lighthouse Sunday morning service. The congregation is given no explanation for the reason Pastor Johnson has been asked to step down. This unexplained move by the Assemblies of God Michigan District to remove Pastor Johnson from active ministry contains an implication of guilt, and allows rumors and evil reports to grow unfettered in the church. People are leaving the church. The Assemblies of God Michigan District does nothing to quell the rumors, unify the growing factions, or restore stability.

Sept 20, 2004 (Mon) – Michigan District United: According to a court brief submitted March 31, 2006 by the AG Michigan District, the District’s action to reclassify Gospel Lighthouse to District Supervised status is reaffirmed in an Executive Board Meeting of the Assemblies of God Michigan District.

Sept 26, 2004 (Sun) – Let the Rumors Spread: For the 2^nd week in a row, Assemblies of God Michigan District provides a stand-in minister for the Gospel Lighthouse Sunday morning service. The congregation is given no explanation for the reason Pastor Johnson has been asked to step down. The implication of guilt grows, and the rumors and evil reports continue to grow unfettered in the church, which is quickly moving towards a church split. Many people have left the church. The Assemblies of God Michigan District does nothing to quell the rumors, unify the growing factions, or restore stability.

Oct 1, 2004 (Fri) – More Evidence Clears Pastor Johnson: Pastor Johnson’s marriage counselor writes a letter to the Michigan District Presbytery that clears Pastor Johnson of the 2^nd allegation, stating that Pastor Johnson is cleared for continued active ministry. Nevertheless, the Assemblies of God Michigan District continue to provide stand-in ministers for the following two Sunday services who say nothing to affirm Pastor Johnson’s innocence. Though we don’t know the date the Michigan District received this letter, we can assume it was early the following week (Mon or Tues).

Oct 2, 2004 (Sat) – Yet More Evidence Clears Pastor Johnson: Michigan District Presbyter Jeff Hlavin returns church/personal computers, and tells Pastor Johnson that nothing was found to substantiate the 3^rd allegation. They begin to discuss Bible software afterwards. In the middle of the conversation, Jeff Hlavin turns his back to Pastor Johnson and without saying a word walks away, gets in his car, and drives off. Pastor Johnson is taken back by Hlavin’s sudden and aloof departure.

Food for thought: Could the lack of goodbyes or even a word to excuse himself be an indication of how Hlavin was viewing Pastor Johnson at this time? Was Pastor Johnson being treated as guilty until proven innocent?

More food for thought: Why do the Michigan District Presbyters, after discovering that two out of three allegations were false, not begin to suspect that the person who made the allegations is lying, and that in all likelihood the third allegation is false as well? Why do they not at this point rally to the support of Pastor Johnson’s integrity?

Oct 3, 2004 (Sun) – The Michigan District Exonerates Pastor Johnson…NOT!: For the 3^rd week in a row, Assemblies of God Michigan District provides a stand-in minister for the Gospel Lighthouse Sunday morning service. The congregation is given no explanation for the reason Pastor Johnson has been asked to step down. The church split grows. Even more people leave the church. The Assemblies of God Michigan District again does nothing to quell the rumors, unify the growing factions, or restore stability.

That evening, the Assemblies of God Michigan District sends District Presbyters Jeff Hlavin and Norm Muhling to host a special evening meeting at Gospel Lighthouse. The church’s members are present, as are the former church members who have chosen to leave the church over the past month. Pastor Johnson and the church Elders are also present, as is the former church elder who passed the allegations on to the Assemblies of God. At the time the meeting is held, the Michigan District has had 4 weeks to interview the former treasurer to determine if the financial allegation is true. They have also had the church’s financial statements in their hands for over two weeks. They also have evidence in hand clearing Pastor Johnson of the 3^rd allegation. Notwithstanding these facts, Norm Muhling further fuels the rumors and solidifies the church split by stating that Pastor Johnson has been asked to step down from active ministry because of “serious accusations” against him, and that an Assemblies of God investigation is ongoing. The accusations are not stated, leaving it to the imagination.  None of the results of the investigation so far are reported. Norm Muhling withholds the information that the Michigan District possesses that clears Pastor Johnson of the allegations. Instead, Muhling states that the District office has been receiving phone calls and faxes every day about the allegations. This statement gives weight to the allegations because the church is small, and if Muhling’s statement is true it would imply that practically the entire church was contacting the District office. Jeff Hlavin then passes out a 14-page document titled, “Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches”, and states that Gospel Lighthouse has been reclassified a District Supervised Church. Jeff Hlavin explains that the church reclassification will have no affect on the church’s weekly operations, and gives the impression that this is only a procedural measure as the Michigan District comes alongside the church to assist in the situation and carry out its investigation. No one at the meeting openly questions the action. For the most part they trust in the good will of the Michigan District. As the congregation flips through the first few pages, they find harmless-sounding theological truths, including the Statement of Fundamental Truths (a statement of 16 theological beliefs that defines the Assemblies of God doctrine). Jeff Hlavin does not mention that buried on page 13 of the 14 page document is a section titled ‘Property Rights’, which states,

“Notwithstanding language to the contrary in these Rules of Order, if the Presbyter Board determines, in its sole and unrestricted discretion, that a church has ceased to be a viable church, or no longer adheres to Assemblies of God doctrine and practices, then the Presbyter Board shall have the option to take possession of and full title to all real, personal, intellectual, tangible and intangible, or other property of whatever kind of the church on behalf of the Assemblies of God, Michigan District…The Assemblies of God, Michigan District, shall forthwith have full authority to use or dispose of the property at the discretion of the Presbyter Board.” – Assemblies of God Michigan District, Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches

That night after the meeting concludes, as people have a chance to read the Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches, concerned Elders and members of the congregation point out to Pastor Johnson the Property Rights clause, and request that Pastor Johnson seek legal counsel.

Food for thought: Why do the Michigan District Presbyters not use this opportunity to heal a volatile church split by declaring Pastor Johnson’s innocence? Why instead do they fuel the rumors and distrust by telling the congregation that “serious accusations” have been made against Pastor Johnson? Why do they imply guilt instead of innocence by continuing to provide stand-in preachers? Why do they not treat Pastor Johnson as innocent until proven guilty? Why do withhold the information they have in hand clearing Pastor Johnson? The Michigan District Presbytery has known about the allegations for 4 weeks; if they are carrying out an investigation, why have they not interviewed any of the church’s remaining Elders during this time? Why, under the guise of coming alongside the church to help it, do they introduce the Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches, which paves the way to arbitrary seizure of the church’s property? Why are the Michigan District Presbyters ignoring the clear conditions and boundaries contained in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution regarding the circumstances and procedures necessary for property transfer to the Assemblies of God?

More food for thought: Who told the former church members (those who had chosen to leave the church) about the meeting with the District Presbyters? Was the District regularly communicating with the cadre of those who had left? How were they able to get in touch with these people, if the church split was not somehow being organized and collectively supported? Where was the leadership and support for this disunity coming from? Was the Michigan District actually fomenting the church split in order to oust Pastor Johnson and the elders, and gain control of the church? Keep reading…

Oct 6, 2004 (Wed) – Gospel Lighthouse Gets a Lawyer: Pastor Johnson seeks out a Christian corporate lawyer, and finds one whose father had been an AG minister, and whose 2 uncles are currently AG ministers. Pastor Johnson feels that such a man will be the best person to fairly review the documents and advise the church properly of its situation. Pastor Johnson gives the lawyer a copy of the Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches, and a copy of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws. The lawyer plans to read these documents over and get back with him the following week.

Oct 9, 2004 (Sat) – Michigan District Property Grab: Assemblies of God Michigan District Presbyter Jeff Hlavin meets with Gospel Lighthouse’s remaining Elders and Pastor Johnson. In this meeting, Jeff Hlavin states that the Elders are no longer officers of Gospel Lighthouse, that his name will be put as signatory on all bank accounts, and that he will be the new president of the Gospel Lighthouse Corporation. Jeff Hlavin does not ask a single question regarding the allegations or investigation. He does not interview the Elders. He does not ask for any input, either regarding the investigation or regarding the terms of the church’s reclassification. Instead, he focuses on an agenda sheet addressing the items necessary for the corporate transfer of Gospel Lighthouse assets to the Assemblies of God. The Pastor and Elders say nothing in response, and agree to nothing. Pastor Johnson brings up the fact that nothing had been found on the computers regarding the 3^rd allegation, and Jeff Hlavin affirms that this is true. Jeff Hlavin also asks for 3 years of checks from the General and Building Funds to be provided to him. He finishes his agenda sheet, then leaves. The leadership of Gospel Lighthouse is now completely convinced that the Michigan District is not acting with integrity. However, they decide to wait until Sunday to see if the Michigan District will declare Pastor Johnson’s innocence.

Food for thought: After 5 weeks, this is the Michigan District Presbytery’s first contact with Gospel Lighthouse’s Elders. Why does the Michigan District Presbyter not take the opportunity to ask what they may know regarding the allegations? Why does he arbitrarily dismiss them as leaders of the church, without giving written disapproval of their doctrine/conduct, and without a 30-day reconciliation period as required by the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution? Why does he not voluntarily share any information regarding the investigation? Why is his meeting solely focused on getting his name on the church’s bank accounts, and being made president of the Corporation?

Oct 10, 2004 (Sun) – Enough is Enough: Assemblies of God Michigan District supplies a stand-in preacher for the 4^th week in a row. This week it is Dave Pace of the District Office. Though it has been a full week since the District Presbyters met with the church body, Dave makes no mention of the investigation’s progress. By now the Michigan District has received the letter from Pastor Johnson’s counselor, and therefore has information to clear Pastor Johnson on all charges. Instead of clearing Pastor Johnson of the untrue allegations, the Assemblies of God Michigan District continues to withhold this information, allowing the allegations to run rampant, and the investigation, now in its 6^th week, to drag on. By now, the damage is done. The church split is mostly complete, with half the congregation having departed, despite sermons preached in June 2004 about the dangers of believing an evil report.

The church Elders and Pastor Johnson are now fully convinced that the Assemblies of God Michigan District is not acting in good faith. Speaking that week with their Christian lawyer, they are in for a greater shock. The lawyer has reviewed Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws and the Michigan District’s Rules of Order for District Supervised Churches. In the opinion of this lawyer who is the son of an AG minister, this is a hostile corporate takeover by the Assemblies of God, and is illegal. He says that usually he will not take on such a case, but he believes that Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws make a solid argument, and if sued they would likely win in a court of law.  After 6 weeks of full and willing submittal to the Michigan District leadership, the church’s Elders and Pastor Johnson decide they will no longer submit to the District’s abuse and attempted takeover.

Oct 16, 2004 (Sat) – Plans For Disaffiliation: In accordance with the protocol set by the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, notice is sent of a special business meeting to be held Monday, October 25, 2004, to vote on a proposed amendment to remove all references to the Assemblies of God from Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws. The notice is signed by Pastor Johnson and the remaining Elders. The Gospel Lighthouse Constitution allows for such action:

“This Constitution may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the committed body in attendance at any regular or special meeting called for that purpose, according to Article IX, Section 3, provided due notice of such proposed change shall have been made at all the services on at least two consecutive Sundays immediately prior to the time of such meeting.” – Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

Food for thought: Ironically, the Assemblies of God legal briefs will attempt to convince Michigan courts that the condition of “two weeks” notice was not met for this special business meeting. But the condition does not say “two weeks”. It says “two consecutive Sundays”. Therefore the condition was met because two consecutive Sundays (Oct 17 and Oct 24) preceded the special business meeting on Monday Oct 25.

Oct 17, 2004 (Sun) – No More Abuse: Gospel Lighthouse refuses to admit this week’s stand-in preacher (District staff member Rev. Jeff Kennedy) sent by the Assemblies of God Michigan District. This has been the 5^th week in a row they have sent a stand-in preacher, without a single word regarding the investigation’s progress or results, or a single word exonerating Pastor Johnson. Pastor Johnson returns to the pulpit. He explains to the congregation the Michigan District’s actions over the past 7 weeks, and states his intent to have nothing more to do with them. Announcement is made of the special business meeting on Oct 25 to vote on removing Gospel Lighthouse from affiliation with the Assemblies of God. Pastor Johnson states that if the committed body membership votes to remain with the Assemblies of God and choose another Pastor, he will submit to that decision and move on.

October 23, 2004 (Sat) – Church Members Fight Back: A financial statement given to the Michigan District over a month ago (Sept 17) should have been sufficient to clear Pastor Johnson of financial allegations. Still, in light of Michigan District Presbyter Jeff Hlavin’s request for 3 years of cleared checks, Pastor Johnson wants this issue put to rest. So he invites a committee of financially competent committed body members to examine the church’s two bank accounts (General Fund and Building Fund) alongside the new treasurer. The committee examines these accounts as far back as records allow, relying on bank statements and canceled checks. The committee releases the following statement:

“Dear Church: On Saturday, October 23, 2004, a committee of five individuals from the committed body membership met to examine the financial records from the General Fund and the Building Fund of Gospel Lighthouse. We examined the records…and have found that Pastor Bobby Johnson has not misappropriated any church funds. It is our unanimous decision that all charges against Pastor Bobby Johnson regarding any misappropriation of church funds are totally false.”

After Gospel Lighthouse is sued by the Assemblies of God, Gospel Lighthouse’s lawyers include this letter in their legal briefs.

Oct 25, 2004 (Mon) – Goodbye, Assemblies of God: Gospel Lighthouse’s remaining members, disgusted at their treatment by the Assemblies of God Michigan District leadership, meet to vote on the removal of all references to the Assemblies of God in the church’s Constitution and Bylaws. Two Presbyters from the Assemblies of God Michigan District attempt to crash the meeting, though they were not invited. They exchange words with Gospel Lighthouse’s lawyer outside the building, stating that the church’s actions are illegal. The church’s lawyer advises the District Presbyters to be careful what they say, because what their actions are illegal (reclassifying Gospel Lighthouse in violation of its Constitution and Bylaws, and attempting to take control of Gospel Lighthouse’s assets and property). The Michigan District Presbyters leave and the meeting proceeds. Gospel Lighthouse’s members unanimously vote to remove themselves from affiliation with the Assemblies of God. The Statement of Fundamental Truths (upon which Gospel Lighthouse and the Assemblies of God still agree) remain unchanged in the church Bylaws. Updated Articles of Incorporation are filed with the State of Michigan 2 days later.

Oct 26, 2004 (Tue) – General Secretary George O. Wood Backs Michigan District: According to a Michigan District court brief, at this time George O. Wood, General Secretary of the General Council of the Assemblies of God, “recognizes and affirms the action taken by the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God,” in regards to the reclassification of Gospel Lighthouse.

Food for thought: The unjust persecution of Gospel Lighthouse now has the official backing of the General Council of the Assemblies of God at the national level. One can only imagine how the story has been misrepresented by the Michigan District. Further below you will see how George Wood, based on what he has heard about the situation from the Michigan District, dismisses a personal appeal from Pastor Johnson to hear Gospel Lighthouse’s side of the story.

Side Note: At some point in late October 2004, Pastor Johnson receives secondhand information from the person who made the allegations against him that the Assemblies of God Michigan District couldn’t understand why Gospel Lighthouse wanted to leave the Assemblies of God, because they were going to clear Pastor Johnson of all the allegations against him.

Jun 14, 2005: On behalf of the Assemblies of God Michigan District, Superintendent William Leach files suit against Gospel Lighthouse for the church’s property.

Food for thought: If the Assemblies of God Michigan District had truly intended to clear Pastor Johnson of the allegations, why do they now sue for his church’s property? Aren’t they supposed to be a “service organization” for the support of member churches? Why do they ignore the Apostle Paul’s injunction against suing believers in front of unbelievers? What fault did they find with Pastor Johnson to merit a lawsuit against him and his congregation?

Aug 23, 2005: Attorneys for William Leach state that he has agreed to an informal exchange of documents in an effort to resolve the matter prior to both sides incurring significant costs and attorney fees, and request copies of the governing corporate documents of Gospel Lighthouse.

Aug 26, 2005: Attorneys for Gospel Lighthouse provide written reply to the AG attorneys, and provide the governing corporate documents of Gospel Lighthouse. The letter points out that the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws specifically reserved the rights of governance and property ownership to the church itself. The letter also states:

“The governing documents are clear. The affiliation of Gospel Lighthouse with the Assemblies of God during the first twenty (20) years of its existence was voluntary and properly terminated. Further, Gospel Lighthouse has controlled its own property and affairs free of interference or residual rights of the Assemblies of God since its organization and continues to do so.” – August 25, 2005 letter from Gospel Lighthouse attorneys to AG attorneys.

Food for thought: The AG continues on with their lawsuit, without any real effort to “resolve the matter”, proving that their information request was only intended to obtain Gospel Lighthouse documents necessary to write the AG briefings against the church.

Mar 31, 2006: Court brief is submitted by Michigan District Superintendent William Leach on behalf of Assemblies of God, Michigan District. We are going to examine in detail the claims made by the Assemblies of God Michigan District in this legal brief. The brief sheds light on the tactics used to convince the courts to give them possession of Gospel Lighthouse’s property. The brief contains the following statement:

 “NOW COME the above-named Plaintiff, ASSEMBLIES OF GOD, MICHIGAN DISTRICT, by its Superintendent, WILLIAM F. LEACH, and GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE ASSEMBLY OF GOD, an Ecclesiastical Corporation, by its District Supervised Director and President, OTIS BUCHAN, by and through their attorneys…for and in support of their Motion for Summary Disposition, state the following:…That the Gospel Lighthouse is a Michigan ecclesiastical corporation, is a member of the Assemblies of God and the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God, which is hierarchical with regard to spiritual matters and polity.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Claim #1: AG IS PREZ. William Leach is claiming that District Presbyter Otis Buchan is the president of the Gospel Lighthouse Corporation.

The Facts: WHO’S THE PREZ? The Michigan District did not follow Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitutional procedure (submitting written disapproval of conduct and waiting 30 days) to make any changes in church leadership. Therefore, the District’s action to replace Gospel Lighthouse’s leaders is invalid.

Claim #2:  TWO CHURCHES ARE ONE. William Leach calls the church “Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God”.

The Facts: CORPORATION MIX-UP. The church’s name is “Gospel Lighthouse” (see Jan 20 1984 entry above), not “Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God”, which is a separate Michigan corporation. This misinformation is intended to imply that Gospel Lighthouse’s relationship with the AG began prior to 1984, which in the eyes of the court might invalidate the restrictive conditions imposed by the 1984 Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws.

Claim #3: ASSEMBLIES OF GOD IS HIERARCHICAL. William Leach claims that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical in its structure, which in Michigan courts of law means that local congregations are completely subservient and subject to the parent organization. William Leach is claiming before the courts of Michigan that the legal status of the Assemblies of God in Michigan is that of a full-fledged denomination just like the Presbyterian Church, and consequently local churches are not under self-governance, but under the absolute rule of the denomination itself.

The Facts: ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CAN’T MAKE UP ITS MIND. The complete subservience of Gospel Lighthouse to Assembly of God would be in violation of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws, upon which its relationship to Assemblies of God is built. Contrast William Leach’s claim that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical with his statement to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker that “Our actions clearly show we are not moving to ‘full denominationalism’” (see Jan 11, 2008 entry below). Also contrast the hierarchical claim with the following AG claims, including interviews with Thomas Trask while he was still the AG CEO:

“In keeping with the original intention of the founding body, the Assemblies of God is considered a cooperative fellowship instead of a denomination. As a result the national headquarters operation exists primarily as a service organization…” – AOG website, Structure of the Assemblies of God

Food for thought: Here the AG acknowledges their founder’s original intent, to not be a hierarchical denomination, but rather a cooperative fellowship. So why does the AG lawsuit now claim they are hierarchical?

“I also believe the Lord is pleased by our renewed focus on the local church. It would be easy to follow the path taken by others and become a hierarchical denomination, but we have to realize that one of the reasons God has blessed this Fellowship is it has given priority to serving the ministries of the local church…The Assemblies of God has an army of wonderful, dedicated, godly ministers who are, frankly, more interested in relationships than they are organizational structure. So, it’s important for us to look at how we function at the national, district, and sectional levels…God raised up the Assemblies of God to be a movement––not a denomination. Our founding fathers never intended for this church to become a denomination…The Assemblies of God must continue to be a Fellowship––a Fellowship that embraces men and women of vision and allows them opportunity to follow the leading of the Spirit.” – Thomas Trask interviewed, from Where Is The Spirit Leading The Assemblies of God?

Food for thought: In claiming that “it would be easy to follow the path taken by others and become a hierarchical denomination”, isn’t Thomas Trask implying that the Assemblies of God is not a hierarchical denomination? If the AG is to be a fellowship that allows ministers to follow the leading of the Spirit, then why does it persecute ministers and churches that the Spirit leads to disaffiliate with the Assemblies of God?

Externally, we were created as a fellowship. There are many who call us a denomination, but there is a world of difference. A denomination, as it ages, becomes more restrictive. It puts in place policies, practices and procedures…A fellowship is a releasing agency. We are 91 years old. However, over this period, we have put into place practices, procedures, and policies that have become more restrictive. I believe, for the 21st century, the church needs to be a releasing agency…But, ultimately, this isn’t about whether the Assemblies of God is a denomination or fellowship. It is about the kingdom of God. This church was raised up by God to serve the kingdom of God. Not to serve a fellowship. Not to serve a denomination.” – Thomas Trask interviewed, from Q&A: Interview with Tom Trask

Amen, Brother Trask. If only Gospel Lighthouse were free to serve the kingdom of God instead of the hierarchical Assemblies of God denomination.

Claim #4: GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE ADMITS THEY ARE UNCONDITIONALLY A PART OF ASSEMBLIES OF GOD.

“…the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws…contain the following provisions: a. That its members recognize themselves as a local fellowship of believers and part of the General Council of the Assemblies of God and of the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God. (Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…Preamble)” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: MISQUOTING THE DOCUMENTS. THERE IS A CONDITION.

“we…do hereby recognize ourselves as a local fellowship of believers,  and a part of The General Council of the Assemblies of God, and of the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…” – Preamble, Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, 1984 version.

Food for thought: Why does the AG Michigan District misquote Gospel Lighthouse’s Preamble by leaving out the conditional clause, “according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse”? Are they trying to hide the fact that Gospel Lighthouse’s participation in the AG is governed according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse?

Claim #5: MICHIGAN DISTRICT CAN CHANGE CHURCH LEADERS.

“…the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws…contain the following provisions: …b. That as the result of its declaration of voluntary and full cooperative fellowship, it acknowledges the rights and responsibilities of being a member of the denomination and Michigan District and the District’s right to appoint a ruling representative when certain matters of controversy develop (Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…Article III 6c)” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: IGNORING PROCEDURES FOR LEADERSHIP CHANGE.

“The Michigan District Of The Assemblies of God shall by every possible means seek to correct such disapproval [disapproval of doctrine or conduct contrary to the Statement of Fundamental Truths (ref. Article III 6a)] with said assembly and if after thirty days from receipt of written notification, no reconciliation can be reached, The Michigan District shall have the right to remove any and all from being a part of ‘the committed body’…; with the right to appoint a representative if no ruling leadership within the assembly can be found supporting doctrine and conduct as found in the Statement of Fundamental Truths found in Article V. of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Assemblies of God, Michigan District, and the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse” – Article III 6c, Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, 1984 version.

When we examine the full text of the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws, we see that the District has the right to appoint a ruling representative only if they give written notification of disapproval of doctrine or conduct, and wait 30 days while trying every possible means to correct the issue. Additionally, after they remove those individuals whose doctrine/conduct was counter to the Statement of Fundamental Truths, they can only appoint a ruling representative if no ruling leadership remains in the church whose doctrine/conduct follows the Statement of Fundamental Truths.

Food for thought: Why does William Leach’s legal brief imply that Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws give the Michigan District unlimited authority to appoint a ruling representative in Gospel Lighthouse, when a plain reading of the church’s Constitution and Bylaws reveals several conditions as well as an entire procedure that must be followed prior to such action? Why did the AG Michigan District arbitrarily appoint Otis Buchan as president of Gospel Lighthouse when the procedure had not been followed? Why did the Michigan District arbitrarily dismiss Gospel Lighthouse’s Elders who still supported the doctrine and conduct of the Statement of Fundamental Truths? Is the AG brief being honest with the facts?

Claim #6: PROPERTY REVERSION CLAUSE.

“…the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws…contain the following provisions: …c. That in the event that the church shall cease to function for the purposes declared in its Constitution, all assets shall be transferred to the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God – (Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…Article XII – Property).” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: IGNORING THE CONDITIONS. This is actually true! But it is completely irrelevant because Gospel Lighthouse has never ceased to function.

Food for thought: Why does the Assemblies of God Michigan District bring up a completely irrelevant fact in their legal brief? Is this an attempt to get the courts to overlook the condition (cessation of the church) and only focus on the resulting action (assets transferring to the Michigan District)?

Claim #7: DEFECTING FROM ASSEMBLIES OF GOD IS DEFECTING FROM THE FAITH.

“…the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws…contain the following provisions:…d. That the Gospel Lighthouse Bylaws, in recognition of the supremacy of the Assemblies of God, specifically provide that the article of Faith as set forth in the Constitution cannot be amended – (Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…Article XIII – Amendments)”

“That the amending of the Constitution, Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation of the Gospel Lighthouse by the named Defendants on October 25, 2004 was tantamount to a “defection” from the Tenets of Faith as stated within Article IV of its own Constitution, which requires the transfer of all its property to the Assemblies of God Michigan District under Article XII.”

“While its own Constitution and Bylaws enacted in 1984 do permit the corporation to amend its Articles, the original Constitution and Bylaws specifically prohibit disaffiliation. ’These Bylaws may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the whole committed body…It shall be understood that this does not apply to the Article of Faith which stands regardless of majority!’…Clearly, a review of the Constitution enacted in 2004 reveals that Article IV of the Tenets of Faith of the Constitution has, contrary to the provisions of the original Constitution and Bylaws, been restated by deleting all reference to the Church’s pledge of loyalty to the Assemblies of God…”

– March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: AG IS FISHING FOR PROOF TEXTS TO JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS. We’re going to examine these claims together, because the Assemblies of God is weaving a single line of logic with these claims. They are arguing that a prohibition in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws against amending the ‘article of Faith’ equates to acknowledgement of the supremacy of the Assemblies of God, and that disaffiliation from the Assemblies of God is a defection from the faith of Jesus Christ that is defined in the Statement of Fundamental Truths. The AG legal brief does correctly quote from Article XIII:

“This Constitution may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the committed body in attendance at any regular or special meeting called for that purpose…It shall be understood that this does not apply to the article of Faith, which stands regardless of majority!” – Article XIII – Amendments, Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, 1984 version.

So the above provision allows Gospel Lighthouse the authority to amend anything in its Constitution, except for the “article of Faith”. What does the article of Faith say? It’s actually ambiguous. This is where the letter of the law and the spirit of the law (its intent) need to be analyzed. If we go by the strict letter of the law, there is no article in the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution or Bylaws that is titled “Faith”. So the “article of Faith” cannot be found. And therein ends the matter. But looking at the spirit of the law, we can examine the question further.

Food for thought: What was the intent of this provision in Article XIII? Was it intended to prevent secession from a religious organization, or to prevent abandonment of theological doctrines in case the Pastor no longer adhered to spiritual truth? Is it possible to maintain loyalty to the doctrines of the AG Statement of Fundamental Beliefs without being a part of the Assemblies of God? Did the Assemblies of God define these truths, or were these truths defined by Jesus and his Apostles, and are only being confirmed in the AG Statement of Fundamental Beliefs? What is the ultimate spiritual authority – Jesus and his Apostles, or the Assemblies of God religious organization?

The AG legal brief attempts to equate the “article of Faith” to an article in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws titled “Tenets of Faith”, which states the following:

“This assembly accepts the Holy Scriptures as the revealed will of God, the all sufficient rule of faith and practice, and for the purpose of maintaining general unity, adopts the Statement of Fundamental Truths of The General Council of the Assemblies of God.”  – Article IV – Tenets of Faith, Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, 1984 version.

So the ‘Tenets of Faith’ article tells us that the standards of faith for Gospel Lighthouse are the Bible and the AG Statement of Fundamental Truths. Article III 6c of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws identifies that the AG Statement of Fundamental Truths are located not only in the Michigan District Constitution and Bylaws, but in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws (see “The Facts” under claim #5 above).

The Statement of Fundamental Truths consists of 16 statements of theological doctrine and conduct, none of which is dependent on continued affiliation with the AG. The fact that the Statement of Fundamental Truths is articulated in the AG Constitution and Bylaws does not give their religious organization absolute authority over every local congregation that agrees with these theological truths. Yet that is exactly what the Michigan District is claiming. They are stating that leaving the Assemblies of God equates to leaving the faith that the Assemblies of God espouses. They do not consider the possibility that a church may leave over issues of religious polity or mistreatment, while still maintaining agreement in doctrine and belief. They do not consider that the Statement of Fundamental Truths remains in Gospel Lighthouse’s Bylaws to this day.

The Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws were amended in 2004 to remove all references to the Assemblies of God, including in the article titled “Tenets of Faith”:

“This assembly accepts the Holy Scriptures as the revealed will of God, the all sufficient rule of faith and practice.” – Article III – Tenets of Faith, Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse, 2004 version.

So does the removal of references to the Assemblies of God really change what Gospel Lighthouse believes (its ‘article of Faith’)? No. Let’s give the AG the benefit of the doubt and assume that Article IV ‘Tenets of Faith’ is what Article XIII means by the ‘article of Faith.’ This changes nothing, because the Statement of Fundamental Truths is contained, word for word, in both the 1984 and 2004 versions of the Gospel Lighthouse Bylaws. Gospel Lighthouse has made no amendment to what it believes. Only Gospel Lighthouse’s relationship to the Assemblies of God organization has been amended. The Michigan District is attempting to win on a technicality, claiming that Gospel Lighthouse defected from the faith, and therefore the reversion clause should be activated, awarding the church’s property to the Assemblies of God. Gospel Lighthouse has never defected from its faith, and still maintains and practices all 16 of the Fundamental Truths to this day.

Food for thought: Looking back at claim #7, the AG Michigan District alleges that Gospel Lighthouse is recognizing “the supremacy of the Assemblies of God”. It is clear from the context that “Assemblies of God” refers to the AG organization, not AG beliefs. Review articles XIII and IV above from the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse. Can you find a statement in either article that recognizes that the Assemblies of God organization is supreme over Gospel Lighthouse?

Claim #8: CHURCH DIDN’T APPEAL RECLASSIFICATION.

“That the District Council Bylaws…provides in relevant part: ‘Any reclassification of a local church…may be appealed to the Presbytery Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting.’ That despite the above, the Warren Gospel Lighthouse elected not to appeal the decision classifying it as a District Supervised Church.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Food for thought: Why should the church appeal a decision that was made in accordance with Michigan District Bylaws, when the church operates according to its own Constitution and Bylaws, and the District’s reclassification would violate the church’s Constitution and Bylaws? Why should the church add strength to tyranny and treat fantasy as reality by responding to a District action that is not binding on the church?

Claim #9: SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE PREVENTS COURT FROM INTERFERING IN ASSEMBLIES OF GOD TAKEOVER.

“That, pursuant to the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article I, Section 4 of the Michigan Constitution, the action of the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God declaring the Gospel Lighthouse a District Supervised Church is not reviewable by a secular Court.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Food for thought: What is the intent of this claim? Isn’t this like a bully beating up an innocent kid, and telling passes-by, “move along, this is none of your business”? This claim, along with Bill Leach’s claim that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical, is the one that wins the day for the Assemblies of God, and allows them to steal the church property of Gospel Lighthouse while getting the courts to turn a blind eye to the injustice.

Claim #10: CHURCH’S HISTORY.

“HISTORY OF THE GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE…On December 27, 1968, the Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God made voluntary application to the Executive Presbytery of the Michigan District Council of the Assemblies of God for official recognition as a dependent assembly.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: WRONG CHURCH. Considering the fact that “Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God” is a separate Michigan corporation from “Gospel Lighthouse” (see Jan 20, 1984 entry),  the big question is “So what? What’s the relevance of this information?” The information given has nothing to do with the “history of the Gospel Lighthouse.” See claim #12 below, where the AG tries to tie the two corporations together.

Food for thought: Irrelevant facts are often used in bluffing games.

Claim #11: ASSEMBLIES OF GOD IS HIERARCHICAL, AGAIN.

“The threshold question is whether or not the Assemblies of God as an ecclesiastical organization is hierarchical in nature. It is the Defendants’ position that a careful review of the Assemblies of God’s Constitution and Bylaws and that of its District, clearly indicates that it is.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: We’re already examined the issue of hierarchical vs. congregational. Bill Leach is clearly claiming that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical, despite the extensive history of the AG organization pointing out that it never was hierarchical (until it suited their agenda).

Claim #12: YOU HAVE NO CHOICE, COMRADE.

“On Page 25 of the Assemblies of God Michigan District Yearbook, there is set forth the following statement: WHAT IS ‘VOLUNTARY COOPERATIVE FELLOWSHIP’…‘voluntary cooperation’ means that once one, of their own free will, decides to become a cooperating member of the Assemblies of God, this cooperation becomes obligatory and not optional…It is exactly this type of affiliation which the Assemblies of God initially sought in 1968 and was ultimately granted on October 19, 1992.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHANGED DEFINITION TO TRAP MEMBER CHURCHES. There is a typo in the AG legal brief. They say, “it was exactly this type of affiliation which the Assemblies of God initially sought.” They meant to say “…which Gospel Lighthouse initially sought.” This is clear by the context, where they are linking the 1968 incorporation of the Gospel Lighthouse Assembly of God to the Gospel Lighthouse corporation which was granted Autonomous Church status in 1992. But the important fact to point out is that the Michigan District is claiming that in 1968, the definition of “voluntary cooperative fellowship” was the same as it is today: “this cooperation becomes obligatory and not optional.”

Food for thought: Ask the Michigan District when this definition of “voluntary cooperative fellowship” was put in their Yearbook. Hint: It was well after 1984. And when did the AG General Council adopt this definition? It was at the 2005 General Council in Denver, 2 months after this legal brief was written. And yet the AG has the audacity to argue in court that Gospel Lighthouse in 1984 intended that its affiliation with the Assemblies of God be based on a definition that wasn’t even in existence at the time. How corrupt can we get here?

Claim #13: EXAMPLES OF ASSEMBLIES OF GOD SUPREMACY.

“…a careful review of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Gospel Lighthouse clearly supports the proposition that it has at all times prior to the Defendants’ actions of October 25, 2004, recognized the supremacy of the General Council of the Assemblies of God and the Michigan District…” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Claim #13-1: AG IS IN GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE’S PREAMBLE!

“PREAMBLE…we…do hereby recognize ourselves as a local fellowship of believers, and a part of The General Council of the Assemblies of God, and of the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse…(Constitution and Bylaws of the Gospel Lighthouse as Adopted 1/20/84)” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: ASSEMBLIES OF GOD HOPES THE COURT IS BLIND. In an incredible move, this time the AG Michigan District accurately quotes the Gospel Lighthouse preamble, leaving in the clause “according to the Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse”, which they left out earlier in their brief (see claim #4 above). But they are apparently hoping the courts overlook this conditional clause that modifies the preceding words, they seem to be making an argument that naming the Assemblies of God in your Constitution and Bylaws gives them supreme authority over your church. Apparently, being a “part” of an entity means that you relinquish all your rights to that entity; even rights expressly reserved to yourself (such as self-government and property ownership).

Food for thought: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” It worked for the Nazis; maybe it will work for the Assemblies of God, too.

Claim #13-2: GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE IS PLEDGED TO ITS AG RESPONSIBILITIES.

“ARTICLE III. AFFILIATION AND RELATIONSHIP. This assembly declares itself to be voluntarily in full cooperative fellowship with all other churches that are affiliated with the Assemblies of God, Michigan District, with headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, and The General Council of the Assemblies of God, with headquarters in Springfield, Missouri; and shares in the privileges and assumes the responsibilities enjoined through this cooperation. (Emphasis added)” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief, quoting Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws.

The Facts: RESPONSIBILITIES HAVE LIMITATIONS. Just as marital responsibility to a spouse is only valid while the spouse is alive, and just as an employee’s obligations to his employer do not apply after he gets off work and goes home, so too the responsibilities of a local church to the Assemblies of God have limits. In 1984, there was no article in the Assemblies of God Constitution and Bylaws that required unquestioned obedience of a local church to an abusive District Presbytery. As we have pointed out before,  the relationship between AG and Gospel Lighthouse is tempered by the limitations and conditions contained in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws. Hence, the responsibilities of Gospel Lighthouse are not defined by a ‘might makes right’ approach whereby the Michigan District forces its Constitution and Bylaws onto the local church.

Food for thought: What version of the Assemblies of God Constitution and Bylaws was in effect when Gospel Lighthouse incorporated in 1984? What was the definition of voluntary cooperative fellowship in 1984? What about the Michigan District’s responsibilities in this relationship? Aren’t they responsible to honor the terms of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws? Remember that Article III of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws, which the Michigan District just quoted, is the section that defines the procedure for removing church leadership; a procedure that the Michigan District  completely ignored (see Sept 13, 2004 entry above).

Claim #13-3: PROPERTY REVERSION CLAUSES EQUALS AG SUPREMACY.

“In addition to the above, a careful review of Article VII supports the proposition that the members of the Gospel Lighthouse who drafted this constitution recognized the supremacy of the General Assembly and Michigan District by providing for the following: a. Making sure that members of the Congregation who elected to leave the Assemblies of God could not take the property with them; b. Provided for the transfer of all property to the Michigan District in the event the church ceased to function for the purposes declared in its Constitution; and c. Transfer of all property to the Michigan District in the event that the church ceased to exist.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: COMPLETE AND UTTER DECEPTION. Property reversion clauses are contingency clauses. They are meant to give rules that apply only in certain extreme circumstances, similar to a person’s will. Just as it would be ludicrous for your children to demand that you execute your will when you are still alive, it is ludicrous for the Assemblies of God Michigan District to demand that property reversion clauses be executed when the conditions for their execution have not been met. Since Gospel Lighthouse has neither ceased to function, nor ceased to exist, items b. and c. are completely irrelevant in the quote above. What about item a., which seems to convey the idea that if Gospel Lighthouse leaves the Assemblies of God, they can’t take their property with them? We already covered this (see Sept 13, 2004 entry above), but it’s so important that you see the AG deception here, I’m re-quoting the relevant section of the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution:

“In the event defection shall occur from the tenets of faith as stated within the Statement of Fundamental Truths…, resulting in a breech with the Assemblies of God, Michigan District, and the same procedure has been followed as stated within Article III, 6…[the procedure of submitting disapproval of doctrine and conduct in writing, and engaging in a 30-day reconciliatory period], any portion of the membership subscribing to and practicing the aforesaid tenets of faith and the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse and retaining membership with Gospel Lighthouse, shall retain possession of, and title to, all properties of said church with full rights thereto as provided in its Constitution and Bylaws.” – Article XII – Property, Section 2., Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

So the AG Michigan District claims that Gospel Lighthouse’s 1984 Constitution ensures that “members of the Congregation who elected to leave the Assemblies of God could not take the property with them.” What a bald-faced lie. As you can see above, it is not members who leave the AG who are prohibited from taking the property with them, but rather it is members who defect from the faith contained in the Statement of Fundamental Truths, and who have been given written disapproval, and have been unable to resolve the issue over a 30-day reconciliatory period. And even then the property does not revert to the Assemblies of God, but instead remains with Gospel Lighthouse members who still adhere to the faith. There is nothing here even remotely resembling what the Assemblies of God Michigan District is claiming.

Food for thought: If the AG did such “a careful review of Article VII” of Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution, they’d know that Article VII has nothing to do with property. It’s about church officers. Article XII deals with property matters. But regardless of a typo, it should be evident that the AG is resorting to fabrications and distortions of fact. Can you see how the Assemblies of God Michigan District has abandoned integrity as they present their arguments to the courts of Michigan? The Michigan District is arguing that any possible area where you touch them is only an example of your complete and unreserved servitude. Arrogance doesn’t get much greater than this.

Claim #14: THE GOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE CASE IS ESSENTIALLY IDENTICAL TO THE GRAFTON ASSEMBLY CASE IN ILLINOIS.

“A careful review of the Illinois Court of Appeals decision in Clay v Illinois District Council, supra, reveals that the Local Assemblies’ Constitution contained provisions almost identical to those of the Gospel Lighthouse regarding its affiliation and disposition of property…the Court of Appeals affirmed the Trial Court’s granting of summary disposition in favor of the Illinois District Council based upon the fact that the Grafton Assembly’s Constitution provided for a reverter clause in the event the church ceased to function as an Assemblies of God Church. While the Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution is not as explicit, a review of all of the provisions as a whole clearly supports the proposition that the same result was intended.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

The Facts: THE LIES CONTINUE. If “the same result was intended”, then that result would have been spelled out in Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution and Bylaws. The Grafton Assembly’s Constitution contains a reverter clause in case the church ceased to function as an Assemblies of God church. The Gospel Lighthouse’s 1984 Constitution does not. Rather, it contains a clause in case the church ceases to function for the purposes declared in the Articles of its Constitution, or in the event of cessation of the church altogether (See Sept 13 2004 entry). There is a world of difference between the two.

Food for thought: The Michigan District says Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution “clearly supports” their contention. Does it? If not, then why do they say it does? Also note that in the case of Grafton Assembly, the Illinois Court of Appeals relied on the language contained in the church’s Constitution and Bylaws. In Gospel Lighthouse’s case, the court has ignored the church’s Constitution and Bylaws in favor of the Michigan District’s recently modified Constitution and Bylaws. The AG Michigan District is proving themselves expert storytellers, as they successfully lead the courts to ignore differences and overemphasize similarities to AG advantage.

Now that the Assemblies of God Michigan District has made its claims, they begin making their requests of the court. This is where the true goal of this lawsuit is seen:

 “WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, ASSEMBLIES OF GOD, MICHIGAN DISTRICT, by its Superintendent, WILLIAM F. LEACH…respectfully request that this Court…grant the following injunctive and declaratory relief:…Enjoin Defendants from removing any chattels, fixtures, books and records from the property…Eject Defendants from the Local Church premises and direct Defendants to deliver all keys to the Plaintiffs…” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

At the end of the day, it’s all about the property. It’s not about coming alongside a congregation and Pastor in their time of trial. It’s not about restoring the kingdom of God in the lives of people. It’s not about continuing to enable a ministry that reaches dozens of unchurched kids each week. It’s not about clearing up false allegations against a Pastor. It’s really just about the property.

“While the Paintiffs/Counter-Defendants do not contest the fact that Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs are as individuals free to disassociate themselves from the Assemblies of God at any time they choose, they are without authority to take the property with them.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Contrast this statement with William Leach’s statement made to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker (see Jan 11, 2008 entry below), stating that the Michigan District has “always respected the right of a congregation to withdraw from the Assemblies of God,” which in its context implies that the Michigan District wouldn’t sue a withdrawing congregation for their property.

“In reviewing the September 20, 2004 Minutes of the Executive Board, it is clear that the allegations against Defendant Johnson were sufficiently serious to cause the Michigan District not only to place the church on a District Supervised status, but also to remove Defendant Johnson from the pulpit during the course of the investigation.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Recall (in the Sept 13, 2004 entry above) that the Assemblies of God Michigan District never had the authority to unilaterally declare Gospel Lighthouse to be a District Supervised Status church, nor to remove any from leadership of Gospel Lighthouse without following the procedure prescribed in the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution and Bylaws.

Food for thought: If the allegations were that serious, then why did the Assemblies of God Michigan District not give a greater level of attention to the investigation, instead letting it drag on for 7+ weeks? Why did they withhold relevant information that had been discovered – information that could have healed the breach in the congregation? Actions speak louder than words.

“A Secular Court is without authority to compel Pastor Johnson to participate in an investigative process of an organization to which he chooses not to belong. He, of course, has the right to form his own church. However, he should not be permitted to do so within the four walls of a building on a parcel of property that has been purchased and maintained by the tithes and offerings of loyal Assemblies of God members for the past 22 years.” – March 31, 2006 AG legal brief

Here the Assemblies of God Michigan District has the gall to imply that Pastor Johnson would not participate in the investigative process, when he submitted to the investigation for 6 weeks as he helplessly watched the church split in two. During this time, the Assemblies of God Michigan District completely stalled the investigation, instead focusing its time and efforts on obtaining control of church assets.  Such an investigation should have taken 2 to 3 weeks at most had it been given proper priority. Even after dragging their feet on the investigation, the Michigan District had discovered enough information to acquit, yet refused to do so.

Second, it is worthy to note that the Gospel Lighthouse church property was indeed purchased and maintained by the church members. Neither the Michigan District nor the General Council of the Assemblies of God paid even a penny for the property’s purchase or upkeep. Yet William Leach paints the picture of a situation that does not exist. Under the pretext of attempting to preserve the property for loyal AG members, his legal brief implies that a rift exists between Pastor Johnson and members of his congregation who supposedly are not in agreement with Pastor Johnson’s decision to leave the AG. But the fact is that the church members chose unanimously to break their affiliation with the Assemblies of God. The Assemblies of God is denying the actions and will of an entire congregation.

Aug 9, 2006 – Michigan Trial Court Says Gospel Lighthouse Keeps Its Property: The trial court releases its Opinion and Order, ruling in favor of Gospel Lighthouse, correctly arguing that Article XII, Section 2 of the Gospel Lighthouse Constitution creates an express trust whereby Gospel Lighthouse is the legal owner of its property.

“In the event defection shall occur from the tenets of faith as stated within the Statement of Fundamental Truths found in Article V. of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Assemblies of God Michigan District, resulting in a breech with the Assemblies of God, Michigan District, and the same procedure has been followed as stated within Article III, 6. a, b, and c, any portion of the membership subscribing to and practicing the aforesaid tenets of faith and the Constitution and Bylaws of Gospel Lighthouse and retaining membership with Gospel Lighthouse, shall retain possession of, and title to, all properties of said church with full rights thereto as provided in its Constitution and Bylaws.” – Article XII – Property, Section 2., Gospel Lighthouse Constitution, 1984 version

Oct 10, 2006 – AG Continues Persecution With Appeal: Not content with the damage they have already done, the Assemblies of God Michigan District continues to persecute Gospel Lighthouse by appealing the trial court’s decision, postponing closure of the case by a year and a half.

Food for thought: Why does the Assemblies of God Michigan District appeal the court’s decision? What is their motive to pursue their legal attack on Gospel Lighthouse? Is this an attempt to further spread the kingdom of God on the earth and fulfill Christ’s commission to make disciples?

Jul 2007 – Court of Appeals Reverses and Remands: The Michigan Court of Appeals reverses the lower court’s decision, claiming that Gospel Lighthouse’s Constitution does not create an express trust for Gospel Lighthouse, and sending the case back down to lower court to determine if AG is hierarchical.

Aug 2007 – George Wood Moves Up: George Wood is elected Chief Executive Officer (General Superintendent) of the Assemblies of God.

Nov 2007 – Pastor Johnson Appeals to George Wood, General Superintendent:  Pastor Johnson writes a personal letter of appeal to Dr. George Wood, now General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God. In the letter, Pastor Johnson brings to Dr. Wood’s attention the disrespect that Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach has shown him and his church. Pastor Johnson points out that there is another side to the story, and asks for a face-to-face audience with Dr. Wood to explain his situation, so that Dr. Wood might intervene. He offers to fly to Springfield, or to fly Dr. Wood to Warren for the meeting.

Nov 8, 2007 – Dr. Wood’s Denial: Dr. Wood responds to the request for a face-to-face meeting to hear Pastor Johnson’s side of the story. In his letter he writes:

“Dear Bobby…I’ve carefully read your letter more than once. Looking back, I wish you had followed the appropriate General Council and District Council Bylaws that have brought appropriate oversight to the church in the initial stages of what happened. But, you denied the district official their rightful place in entering your church and you held a meeting to disaffiliate the church in violation of the district and General Council Bylaws, and perhaps in violation of your own church bylaws in giving fair notice to all members of a called meeting. So, I don’t think this can be undone unless you were willing to go to the district and in a spirit of humility submit to what the district has requested.” – Letter from Assemblies of God General Superintendent George Wood to Pastor Bobby Johnson, Nov 8 2007

Dr. Wood’s letter implies that Pastor Johnson did not submit to district oversight. But the truth is that Pastor Johnson had cooperated with the Michigan District for 6 weeks (see Oct 10, 2004 entry). Note that Dr. Wood gives a single condition to ‘undoing’ the situation: to submit to the Michigan District’s leadership. But this condition does not consider the possibility that the Michigan District leadership may be improper, biased, vindictive, or unhealthy.

Food for thought: It is obvious that Dr. Wood has believed the Michigan District’s account of the situation, and is not willing to hear the other side of the story. Note how Dr. Wood brings up the idea that Gospel Lighthouse’s meeting to disaffiliate may not have given fair notice. This information came from the Michigan District, who included this accusation in their court briefs. We have already showed that the meeting to vote on Gospel Lighthouse’s disaffiliation was in accordance with their church Bylaws (see Oct 16, 2004 entry).

More food for thought: What does this letter reveal about the ability of local churches to appeal to a higher authority in case of District abuse? If the highest level of managers blindly back middle management, then middle management is no longer accountable, and is out of control.

Nov 28, 2007 – The Story of Another Church: Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker of Michiana Christian Embassy in Niles, MI, who served five years (2000-2005) as a Sectional Presbyter for the Assemblies of God Michigan District, informs Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach by letter that Michiana Christian Embassy intends to remove itself from affiliation with the Assemblies of God. The letter references “significant changes made to the District Bylaws during the Council held in Midland, that saw significant changes to the administrative structure of the District”. This move is prompted by such changes, as well as concerns with the direction of the AG organization. The letter informs Bill Leach of the date and time of the final congregational vote, and invites him to send District representation to the meeting, for the purpose of addressing the congregation before the final vote. It should be noted that Pastor Whittaker, due to his time of service as a Sectional Presbyter, knows District Superintendent William Leach personally.

Dec 4, 2007 – William Leach Tries To Trump With AG Bylaws: District Superintendent Bill Leach, in a telephone conversation with Pastor Jeff Whittaker states that Pastor Whittaker’s church, as a local autonomous assembly, is still subject to General Council Bylaws. Pastor Whittaker replies in a letter later that day:

“When you stated that we, as a local autonomous assembly are still subject to General Council Bylaws, you raise the very essence of one of our main contentions. How can a local church, with its own bylaws legally in place and declared authoritative by its articles of incorporation, have them simply nullified by another set of bylaws in Springfield or Farmington Hills. This means that the words ‘local’, ‘autonomous’, and ‘sovereign’ are merely cosmetic, and that each set of local bylaws is not worth the paper they are written on.” – Letter from Michiana Christian Embassy Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker to Assemblies of God Michigan District Superintendent William Leach, Dec 4, 2007.

Dec 19, 2007 – Michiana Christian Embassy Disaffiliates With AG: At a special business meeting, a 95% congregational vote of Michiana Christian Embassy removes Michiana Christian Embassy of Niles, MI from affiliation with the Assemblies of God. Michigan District Superintendent William Leach is present at the meeting, and is allowed time to address his appeal to the congregation. Despite Bill Leach’s appeals, the congregation votes to disaffiliate. During his appeal to the church, Bill Leach states,

“…and if that’s God’s Will for you to leave, we’ll be disappointed to be sure; but you certainly can do that…” – Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach in his address to Michiana Christian Embassy on Dec 19, 2007.

Food for thought: Watch below as Bill Leach reneges on his statement that Michiana Christian Embassy can “certainly do that”.

“A few years ago the Michigan District changed our Bylaws to allow the District Superintendent to become involved in a local church during crisis times. I have the responsibility to meet with the Pastor, the Board, or the church body, to help resolve issues. I also can temporarily reclassify a church, bringing it under the covering of District Leaders while health is being restored.” – Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach in his address to Michiana Christian Embassy on Dec 19, 2007.

Let’s think back to the Gospel Lighthouse situation. Gospel Lighthouse put together its own Constitution and Bylaws in 1984, which laid out a specific procedure by which the Michigan District could get involved in Gospel Lighthouse’s issues. Here in late 2007 Bill Leach admits publicly that the Michigan District Bylaws were changed “a few years ago” to allow him to get involved in a local church during crisis times. “A few years ago” cannot be prior to 1984. Therefore, the Michigan District here admits to making a unilateral change which is used as the basis for invalidating a local church’s previously-approved Constitution and Bylaws. Additionally, Bill Leach is claiming that he has the power to reclassify a church. Even if that were true, that kind of power in the hands of one man is cause for concern,  as it gives Leach an excuse to sue a local congregation for its property. And perhaps most disturbing of all, Leach claims that the reclassification of a church is to bring it “under the covering of District Leaders while health is being restored.”

Food for thought: How was Gospel Lighthouse’s health restored by the District’s reclassification and covering?

Dec 20, 2007 – Pastor Jeff Resigns Credentials: Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker writes a letter to Superintendent William Leach, tendering his resignation as an Assemblies of God credential holder.

Jan 11, 2008 – The Right Hand of Disfellowship: Michigan District William Leach writes a letter to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker of Michiana Christian Embassy in Niles, MI. William Leach writes in his letter to Pastor Whittaker:

“…the Michigan District cannot accept your resignation pursuant to General Council Bylaws…Your leadership in the congregation’s withdrawal is cause for disciplinary action…If you choose not to meet, the Executive Board may request the General Council Credentials Committee that you be dismissed as an Assemblies of God minister. I am very sorry it has come to this.”  – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jan 11, 2008.

So Bill Leach is rejecting Pastor Whittaker’s resignation, and is instead implying that Pastor Whittaker has done something wrong. However, Pastor Whittaker has followed every procedure within the Constitution and Bylaws of his church, Michiana Christian Embassy.

Food for thought: Beginning to see a pattern here? If Bill Leach is, as he states, “very sorry that it has come to this” (rejecting Pastor Jeff’s resignation, and calling for disciplinary action), then wouldn’t he allow Pastor Whittaker to voluntarily resign? Is he actually sorry, or is he just disguising unkindness with politeness? What is the purpose of attempting disciplinary action on someone who has left your organization? Is it love, or spite?

“You have alleged that there are ‘disturbing signs of an ever-increasing trend towards full denominationalism’…Our actions clearly show we are not moving to ‘full denominationalism’.” – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jan 11, 2008.

Food for thought: If the Assemblies of God is not moving to ‘full denominationalism’, then why did William Leach in his Mar 31, 2006 legal brief against Gospel Lighthouse claim that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical? As William Leach is writing the statement above to Pastor Whittaker, he must be aware that a year and a half earlier he told the courts of Michigan that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical.

“I was aware, of course, of your concerns regarding the Denver General Council resolutions. Leaders debate and disagree regularly without the notion that it is a conversation about leaving the Fellowship.” – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jan 11, 2008.

Food for thought: So here Bill Leach refers to the Assemblies of God as a ‘Fellowship.” But in his Mar 31 2006 legal brief against Gospel Lighthouse, he claims that the Assemblies of God is a hierarchical ecclesiastical organization (See Mar 31, 2006 entry, Claim #11). Why can’t William Leach make up his mind? Or does the status of the Assemblies of God change as it suits Leach’s purposes? Does he woo churches with the language of “Fellowship”, only to trap them within an absolute hierarchy?

“While we have always respected the right of a congregation to withdraw from the Assemblies of God the loss of fellowship and friendship is a great tragedy. As an ordained Assemblies of God minister your leadership in this matter contradicts your commitments to our Fellowship that are clearly outlined in the General Council and District Council constitution and bylaws and is heartbreaking.” – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jan 11, 2008.

Just as in the case with Gospel Lighthouse, here the Assemblies of God Michigan District sees  the situation through glasses colored by its own recently-changed Constitution and Bylaws, completely ignoring the long-established Constitution and Bylaws of the local church.

Food for thought: If William Leach respected the right of a congregation to withdraw from the Assemblies of God, why did he choose to sue Gospel Lighthouse 2 ½ years earlier for their property, after the congregation unanimously chose to withdraw from the Assemblies of God? Why, after Gospel Lighthouse won the lawsuit, did he then choose to appeal the case further?

“I urge you to meet with the Executive Board in a spirit of reconciliation. Even now, the door is open to you and your congregation.” – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jan 11, 2008.

Food for thought: Doesn’t this sound like a plea to get the church back in the fold? And why? For the furtherance of the kingdom of God, or so that once back in the fold, the Michigan District can slap the “District Supervised Status” label on Michiana Christian Embassy and steal their property, too?

Jan 15, 2008 – Pastor Jeff Challenges Leach’s Statements: Pastor Jeff Whittaker writes a letter to AG Michigan District Superintendent William Leach, challenging Leach’s actions and the statements in his letter of Jan 11. In particular, Pastor Whittaker quotes from a recorded telephone conversation between himself and Leach that took place prior to Michiana Christian Embassy’s vote to remove itself from AG affiliation. In this conversation, Bill Leach states,

“Jeff, we’re not trying to hassle you about the process of pulling out, if you…your church votes to do it, you’re not going to get any hassle from us.” – Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach during telephone conversation with Pastor Jeff Whittaker, before Michiana Christian Embassy left the Assemblies of God

Food for thought: Based on William Leach’s actions against Gospel Lighthouse, either Leach has a novel definition of the word ‘hassle’, or he’s been so busy hassling Gospel Lighthouse that he’s going to let Michiana Christian Embassy off easy. Taking someone to court and wrapping them in a 5-year legal battle over their property – doesn’t that fall under the definition of “hassle”?

Pastor Whittaker then calls Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach on the carpet:

“Following our last informational meeting on 11/25/07, our notification letter was sent to the District Office; posted on 11/28. You knew what direction we were moving in then, and yet you did not arrest my credentials under the authority of the General Council Bylaws which you now cite as grounds for rejecting my resignation. Also, why didn’t you exercise your ‘responsibility’ by intervening in a situation that was clearly a ‘crisis’ when you first heard of our decision back on Thursday, 11/8? Our Official Business meeting was not held for approximately another six weeks after that; leaving you plenty of time to intervene. I know how the District works; a few calls to your executive team and Presbyter Board via phone poll, and you could have moved on our Assembly and ‘brought it under the covering of District Leaders’. It is beneath both your dignity and mine for you to now insinuate that you were victimized by an uncooperative pastor and church that rushed deadlines, failed to communicate, etc.” – Letter from Pastor Jeff Whittaker to Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach, Jan 15, 2008

Jan 25, 2008 – Court Says Assemblies of God is Hierarchical: Switching gears back to the Gospel Lighthouse case, The Macomb County, Michigan trial court finds that the Assemblies of God is hierarchical. This decision means that the property of Gospel Lighthouse belongs to the Assemblies of God Michigan District. The Michigan District can take over the ownership and leadership of the Gospel Lighthouse Corporation (or any other Michigan AG church), and the courts will not interfere.

Feb 2008 – Gospel Lighthouse’s Turn to Appeal: Gospel Lighthouse appeals the trial court’s decision. The case moves back to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Feb 6, 2008 – The Empire Strikes Back: Back to the story of Pastor Jeff in Niles, MI. The Assemblies of God Michigan District Superintendent William Leach writes a letter to Pastor Jeff Whittaker of Michiana Christian Embassy, stating:

“A motion prevailed at the Executive Board meeting of the Assemblies of God, Michigan District that we recommend to the General Council Committee that you be dismissed as an Assemblies of God minister pursuant to General Council Bylaws, Article X., Section 3., c..” – Letter from Michigan District Superintendent Bill Leach to Pastor Jeff Whittaker, Feb 6, 2008

Jeff Whittaker points out that this action has horrible implications, because ARTICLE X., SECTION 3., c. states the reason for such dismissal as:

“Any moral or ethical failure other than sexual misconduct.” – ARTICLE X., SECTION 3., c – Assemblies of God General Council Bylaws.

Jeff Whittaker also aptly points out that there is nothing in the Michigan District or General Council Bylaws that state that an Assemblies of God credential holder will be charged with moral failure for leading his local church out of the Assemblies of God. Yet here they subjectively and arbitrarily apply “moral and ethical failure” to anyone leading their church out of the AG. Pastor Jeff was under no investigation. There had been no charges. Yet he is being recommended for dismissal in a shameful way.

Food for thought: What is the purpose of the Assemblies of God kicking its ministers out the door in the most shameful way possible, when they choose to voluntarily leave the AG? Is it the love of Jesus Christ, or is it retaliation?

Mar 10, 2008 – The Empire Stands United: The Assemblies of God General Secretary John Palmer writes a letter to Pastor Jeff Whittaker of Michiana Christian Embassy, dismissing him as an Assemblies of God minister (rather than allowing him to resign).

“The credential committee of the General Council of the Assemblies of God has received from the Michigan district council the information concerning your relationship with the Assemblies of God. This included a recommendation by the presbytery of the district that your name be shown as dismissed from the ministerial list. The General Council Credential Committee has concurred in the recommendation of the District and will, therefore, show your name as dismissed from the ministerial list, and also list your name accordingly in the ministers letter. In conjunction with this action your attention is called to Article X of the General Council Bylaws, which contains provisions for termination of credential, discipline of member, and appeals. We deeply cherish for your God’s very best, knowing that no discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful…(Hebrews 12:11)…God bless you! John M. Palmer General Secretary” – Letter from Assemblies of God General Secretary John M. Palmer to Pastor Jeff Whittaker, Mar 10, 2008

Food for thought: The General Council of the Assemblies of God stands behind their districts, no matter how corrupt, unreasonable, illogical, or abusive they become. As you will see below, in reality there is no appeal to this process, nor is there interest by the AG General Council in hearing the other side of the story. These actions of the Assemblies of God Michigan District and General Council are not the work of God in action. The Assemblies of God is casting aside the teachings of Christ (to love one another) for the traditions of men (their own Bylaws).

Mar 28, 2008 – The Attempt at Appeal: Pastor Jeff Whittaker writes to the Assemblies of God General Council Executive Presbytery, to appeal his dismissal, and ask for a statement of the charges against him. In this clear and well-written letter, he reiterates many of the facts above, as well as the following:

“Pursuant to my reception of the General Council Credential Committee’s March 10^th, 2008 notification letter informing me of their confirmation of the Michigan District council’s recommendation to dismiss me as an ordained minister…I am asking that you, the General Council Credentials Committee, help me to understand, using specific language contained in the General and or District Council Bylaws, the exact charges relative to my role in the departure of Michiana Christian Embassy from affiliation with the Assemblies of God. According to Article VI, Section 4, paragraph d of the General Council Bylaws: ‘In the event the termination of affiliation with the General Council of the Assemblies of God is under consideration by an affiliated assembly, the pastor or board shall invite the district officers to participate in a specially called business meeting for the express purpose of giving the district officers the opportunity to present the case for continued General Council affiliation. Final disposition of the matter may then proceed in accordance with the constitution and bylaws of the local church.’ I couldn’t help but notice that this bylaw states that the action of terminating affiliation is to be initiated by either the local pastor or board. If this clearly defined action may be initiated (and by extension led) by the local pastor, how then can that same pastor be justly dismissed as having a ‘moral or ethical failure’ after having followed the letter of the (Assemblies of God’s) law?….I am not appealing for reinstatement, but rather requesting that my resignation of 12/20/07 be allowed to stand, as well as requesting a precise definition (directly from the General Council Bylaws) of the charges leveled against me. Article VII, Section 11, paragraph a, subparagraph (2) states that: ‘Resigned. Ministers who elect to remove themselves from the Fellowship shall submit a letter of resignation to the district with which they are affiliated. If there is no cause for disciplinary action, their resignation shall become effective after having been approved by both the district council and General council credentials committees. Their termination shall be listed in the ministers letter as resigned.’…If I had resigned in order to escape an embarrassing personal revelation to avoid prosecution on some pending matter, I would completely understand the District and General Council’s actions…What crime then do I now stand accused of? Simply leading a local autonomous Assembly in a constitutionally defined and legal procedure, which is not prohibited anywhere within the texts of the General or District Council’s constitution and bylaws.” – Letter from Pastor Jeff Whittaker to Assemblies of God General Council Executive Presbytery, Mar 28, 2008

Food for thought: Lest it be thought that the Assemblies of God is simply following their own Bylaws over those of local churches, Pastor Jeff’s situation points out that the AG is not even willing to abide by its bylaws. Here is a Pastor who has followed the letter of the both his local church Bylaws, and the Bylaws of both District and General Council. Yet he is dismissed for taking an action that those Bylaws allow. Look at the General Council’s response to Pastor Jeff’s appeal below:

Jun 11, 2008: The Assemblies of God Refuses to Listen: John Palmer, General Secretary of the Assemblies of God, chooses to back Bill Leach and the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God, and deny Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker’s appeal to be allowed to simply resign, rather than being shamefully dismissed:

“At the most recent meeting of the Executive Presbytery, the following action was taken: A Motion prevailed to deny the appeal of Jeffrey L. Whittaker that he be allowed to resign rather than be dismissed, based upon his ethical failure in leading an Assemblies of God church into a decision to pull out of the fellowship. This decision was made after a great deal of prayerful discussion. In making this decision it was duly noted that you and your church followed the proper procedures in terminating affiliation with the General Council of the AG (Article VI, Section 4, d). While you followed proper protocol in how you led the church to disaffiliate, the ethical failure, in the view of the General Council Credentials Committee, was that you had a part in the process… It is the thoughtful opinion of the Executive Presbytery that you acted unethically by helping to disaffiliate a local church from the AG while you were an AG minister. Thank you for your years of ministry with the AG. I wish you well as you continue the ministry to which the Lord has called you.” – Letter from Assemblies of God General Secretary John M. Palmer to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Jun 11, 2008

The import of this letter cannot be overstated:

1. The Assemblies of God at its highest national level considers leaving their organization an unethical decision, even if it is done in accordance with all the rules made available for doing so. It’s one thing to be disappointed in such a decision. But it’s quite another call such a decision ‘unethical’. The AG at both the national level and district level is placing itself and its denominational authority on the same level as God’s word.
2. The Assemblies of God Executive Presbytery, after “a great deal of prayerful discussion” makes this decision as a “thoughtful opinion”. This is not a rash decision, or an off-the-cuff comment.
3. The Assemblies of God Executive Presbytery believes that you are “acting unethically” if you leave the AG to do “the ministry to which the Lord has called you.” So they are positing that it can be unethical to follow God’s call.

Jul 1, 2008 – Pastor Whittaker’s Final Appeal: Pastor Jeff Whittaker pens his final appeal to the Assemblies of God General Presbytery.

“…I desire to reiterate my basic question that has never been adequately answered by any level of leadership in our beloved movement. Where, within the body of our district or general council bylaws, is it defined as immoral or unethical for a local pastor who follows Bylaw article VI, Section 4, paragraph ‘d’, to lead, counsel, or advise a local, autonomous assembly in the act of disaffiliation? I am not asking for a subjective statement of how this action makes the District and General Council Officials feel, but rather which AG Bylaw makes it illegal, immoral, and unethical…using Article X to support your decision for my dismissal is a classic example of circular reasoning. Article X does not provide a legal explanation of my ‘alleged’ moral and ethical failure, but merely labels a broad category which demands legal definition by a law explicitly describing an act as prohibited; something which the General Council Bylaws do not do in this case (as opposed to adultery, embezzlement, etc). If you should choose to sponsor legislation at a future General Council to amend Articles VI or X to include explicit language forbidding credential holders from leading their local and autonomous churches in a legally defined action, very well; but as of today there is not one statement within our rules of order that supports this arbitrary, punitive, and libelous ruling!” – Letter from Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker to General Presbytery of the Assemblies of God, Jul 1, 2008

Aug 12, 2008 – No Explanation, Just a Deaf Ear (and Pastor Whittaker is Out On His Ear): Pastor Jeff Whittaker receives a letter from General Secretary John M. Palmer, stating that the General Presbytery upholds the Executive Presbytery’s decision.  No explanation is given.

“…I trust you and your family are doing well during this beautiful summer season. I am writing this letter in response to your appeal of dismissal that was presented to the General Presbytery of The General Council of the Assemblies of God. The Ministerial Relations Committee prayerfully and carefully examined the information regarding your appeal. On Monday, August 11,2008, following a presentation by the chairman of the Ministerial Relations Committee, the General Presbytery voted to uphold the decision of the Executive Presbytery to concur with the Michigan district to dismiss you as an ordained minister of The General Council of the Assemblies of God. While I am sure you are disappointed by this decision, I trust you will find strength in knowing that God has called you to serve Him, and you are doing so in the place He has given you to serve. May you and your family and ministry continue to experience the favor and blessing of the Lord.” – – Letter from Assemblies of God General Secretary John M. Palmer to Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker, Aug 12, 2008

Food For Thought: Um, excuse me? You’re praying blessings over an “unethical” minister? Or could it be that he wasn’t unethical after all? And where is the explanation of the charges? Where is the answer to Jeff’s question, about how it is in accordance with the AG Bylaws to label a person as “unethical” for leading people out of the AG? And what’s with the greeting, “I trust you and your family are doing well during this beautiful summer season”? I’m sure he is doing well, except for the apparently non-apparent fact that you are shamefully dismissing him as an AG minister.

More Food for Thought: What do you think of the AG appeals process now? Consider how the wording of Resolution 12 of the 2009 General Council is predicated on the “fact” that, “General Council Constitution Article XI. LOCAL ASSEMBLIES, Section 1, paragraph e, provides safeguards to a General Council affiliated church from any possible abuse of the prerogative by a district through an appeal to the Executive Presbytery, and ultimately, the General Presbytery when there is a question whether or not the assembly has received proper help from the district.” So if the appeal process is supposed to be a safeguard for the local church, yet the General and Executive Presbytery blindly side with the District, then what safeguard is left for the local assembly?

Jun 18, 2009 – Michigan Court of Appeals Says Assemblies of God is Hierarchical: The Michigan Court of Appeals releases its opinion, ruling to uphold the circuit court’s decision, which finds the Assemblies of God hierarchical. Among the misinformation the court’s opinion includes from the Assemblies of God Michigan District legal briefs:

“The organizing documents of the Michigan District provide further proof that Assemblies of God is a hierarchical organization. First, the Michigan District Yearbook explains the meaning of “voluntary cooperative fellowship”: “once one, of their own free will, decides to become a cooperating member of the Assemblies of God, this cooperation becomes obligatory and not optional.” – Michigan Court of Appeals Unpublished Opinion, Jun 18, 2009

Note that this definition of voluntary cooperative fellowship was not adopted by the Assemblies of God until its General Convention in August 2005, a full two months after the Assemblies of God Michigan District initially brought suit against Gospel Lighthouse. And this language was, if I remember correctly, not added to the Michigan District Constitution and Bylaws until 2005. 

Food for thought: The Assemblies of God Michigan District’s decision to include this changed definition in their legal briefs shows a complete lack of integrity. It would be as if you signed a purchase agreement with a car dealer, and then two months after you signed the contract, the car dealer unilaterally changed the contract’s wording to give himself title to your house. The Michigan Court of Appeals is holding Gospel Lighthouse to a definition that was not even in existence when the lawsuit was filed.

Now that the precedent has been set, property reversion clauses in a local church’s Constitution and Bylaws are now moot in Michigan. Regardless of reverter clauses, the courts will not interfere with the Michigan District of the Assemblies of God if District Superintendent William Leach arbitrarily decides to downgrade a church to district supervised status, at which time he can force that church to sign over its assets, including property. And because the AG is now hierarchical instead of congregational, Michigan courts will turn a blind eye to the injustice, and will not apply civil law to the property dispute. It is outside their jurisdiction, and now William Leach has complete discretionary control of all assets of AG churches in Michigan. All he needs to do is get an informal telephone vote from the MI District presbyters (who will take his word rather than find out the other side of the issue), and you’re a district supervised church without the right to own your own property, and will be asked to sign over the title.

As you can see from the facts above, the Assemblies of God Presbytery contains as much corruption today as the Sanhedrin did in Jesus’ day. I urge you to band together and demand accountability of AG leadership for their actions. If enough AG churches make a unified statement, the AG organization will eventually have to listen…or break apart. There is nothing remaining to protect churches from the corruption of District and General Council Presbytery. And if you decide to ever disaffiliate from the Assemblies of God, make sure you do so before the District Presbytery catches wind of your decision, and arbitrarily declares you a District Supervised Church. Though you won’t escape with your good name, at least you’ll keep your property.

 

Goodbye, Gospel Lighthouse

“Whenever they persecute you in one city, flee to the next.” – Jesus

Why It Matters To You – Pastor Johnson’s Plight Will Soon Be Your Reality

(Dangers of Proposed Resolutions For The 53^rd General Council, Aug 4-7, 2009, Orlando, FL)

After 25 years of sacrificial ministry in the needy area of southeast Warren, at 59 years old, Pastor Johnson’s reputation and ministry have been destroyed by the Assemblies of God Michigan District’s actions and lawsuit, which have left him with no church building or capital. This has all been sacrificed so the AG Michigan District would have case precedent for taking over properties of member churches. Remember, this started with unsubstantiated, untrue allegations. If this could happen to him, it could happen to you. You have seen above how there is no realistic appeal of a local district’s actions to either the Executive Presbytery, the General Presbytery, or the General Superintendent of the Assemblies of God. They unquestioningly side with the actions of their districts. They have adopted an attitude of hierarchical superiority, even to the point of exalting Assemblies of God Constitution and Bylaws above Scripture. Actions that can be excused on the basis of their corporate documents give the AG leave to practice situational ethics.

Rather than repent of these practices, the Assemblies of God organization is shifting these practices into high gear. They are learning what works at the District Level and elevating those practices to the national level. Three of the proposed resolutions for the 53^rd General Council present grave danger to all AG churches in America. They are Resolutions 12, 13, and 14.

Resolution 12 – Organizational Assistance: This resolution, partially sponsored by the Michigan District Presbytery, tries to take the tried and true method of church control in Michigan and other states, and implement it on the national level.  If you’ve read the stories above, you’ve seen how the Michigan District Bylaws gave the District Presbyter excuse to arbitrarily reclassify a local church to “District Supervised” status, which is only one more arbitrary decision away from property confiscation.  The danger of proposed resolution 12 is that it expands the powers of “assistance” (so-called) of the General or District councils, to the point where the district can, “at its discretion” take action to “bring the church under district supervision…” Sound familiar? The AG found a blueprint that works (Michigan), and is taking it to the national level. This dastardly resolution also proposes  to give the AG authority to revert a church from General Council status to district affiliated status. If the General and District Councils were ethical, it wouldn’t be a concern, but given their actions documented in this paper above, doesn’t it scare your socks off?

Resolution 12 is predicated on the following statements:

“WHEREAS, The history of many General Council churches includes hurt and confusion in the wake of unhealthy actions by parishioners, board members, and/or ministers which can result in the departure from the local church and from the Fellowship at large by stable pastors, members, and family units…”

Food for thought: Unhealthy actions by parishioners, board members, and ministers? What about unhealthy actions by AG Presbyters??? When are these folks going to take responsibility for their own actions?

“WHEREAS, The term ‘organizational assistance’ can be interpreted in a variety of ways with a variant of implications, especially in times of heightened conflict, distress, and pressure;”

Food for thought: Don’t you mean, “especially considering the abuse carried out in the name of ‘organizational assistance’?”

“WHEREAS, Healthy intervention by the district in response to an invitation from the local church may only be achieved, in many cases, if the district leadership has been empowered to make decisions with authority;”

Food for thought: There is a flip side to empowerment of district leadership. It not only enables healthy intervention, it enables unhindered abuse. Especially when there is no realistic appeal from this abuse.

 “WHEREAS, Temporarily reverting a General Council assembly to district affiliated status allows the leadership of the district to act with clarity and authority…”

Food for thought: The question is, what action will they take? If history is any indication, the future isn’t looking too bright.

“WHEREAS, General Council Constitution Article XI. LOCAL ASSEMBLIES, Section 1, paragraph e, provides safeguards to a General Council affiliated church from any possible abuse of the prerogative by a district through an appeal to the Executive Presbytery, and ultimately, the General Presbytery when there is a question whether or not the assembly has received proper help from the district…”

Food for thought: This is a complete farce. In reality, there is no appeal from District abuse. You have seen how Pastor Jeffrey Whittaker appealed his case to both the Executive and General Presbytery, and they completely ignored his plea. Despite saying they had prayerfully discussed his plea, they gave him no authoritative basis to which his conscience could appeal as a reason for his mistreatment. And you have also seen how Pastor Bobby Johnson’s direct appeal to George Wood was dismissed, based on the misinformation he had received from the Michigan District.

Resolution 13 – Disaffiliation Percentage: This resolution aims to define a 2/3 majority vote requirement for churches that disaffiliate. It looks as if this resolution resulted directly from the “textbook” of Jeff Whittaker’s situation. The scary thing is not so much that it adds a condition of a two-thirds vote of the congregation, but that it invalidates the constitution and bylaws of the local church. The language currently reads:

“Final disposition of the matter may then proceed in accordance with the constitution and bylaws of the local church;”

Resolution 13 would change this to read:

“Final disposition of the matter may then proceed in accordance with a two-thirds vote of the congregation. the constitution and bylaws of the local church;”

We have already seen how Pastor Jeff Whittaker was dismissed as unethical after following the Bylaws of his church, the Michigan District, and the General Council to the letter. Resolution 13, with its removal of the constitution and bylaws of the local church, would not prevent any District from similarly condemning the pastor of any church that disaffiliates. And if they can reclassify the church as “district supervised” before the vote takes place, they could take possession of the church’s property, and the courts couldn’t interfere. Don’t be fooled by this resolution which seems to give power to the local church! The actions of the AG at both the district and national levels over the past 5 years have clearly demonstrated their game plan. Disaffiliation is not acceptable, under any circumstance, period.

Resolution 14 – Amending Bylaws at General Council: This resolution aims to relegate future amendments to General Council Bylaws to the General Presbytery.

Food for thought: The reasoning behind this resolution? Well, apparently the business of the General Council interferes with the Fine Arts Festival. God forbid that we should miss a concert! Essentially, this resolution allows you to give your freedom away so you can go play. Hey, after all, the younger generation of Pastors doesn’t want to be bothered with business anyway. They’re too busy rocking out at the Fine Arts Festival, right? Do you really trust these men enough to give them unlimited control, as they further amend Bylaws to their heart’s content while placating you with Fine Arts Festivals? Remember, it is much easier for the AG ruling elite to quash, buy off, or placate opposition in the 200-something member General Presbytery, than it is in the General Council.

This article is part of a series of blog posts titled ‘Assemblies of God vs. Christianity’. The entire series can be found at http://onthuhlist.wordpress.com/?s=aog. Information compiled and article written by onthuhlist (gmail.com).

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)